Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

The Stepford Wives (2004)

This remake of the classic 70's thriller is loaded with so many bad ideas per scene that it simply has to be one of the worst films of the year. This film is so deliciously bad that it makes a jaded and snotty film critic like myself practically have a full release in my shorts while watching it and dreaming up all the droll and cruel comments I can type on my little laptop when I get home. This is a horrible idea, to remake a classic, taunt 70's shocker into a goofy modern comedy. And it is so obvious that this is a film by committee. There's no vision here, but then again, there's no script, no acting and no reason to even make this film - other than to trot out something with a familiar title for the summer masses either.

Nicole Kidman is simply Godawful as Joanna Eberhard, a TV executive (the opening segment where she present her new summer shows sets us up to see just how shitty this film is going to be) who gets fired (in the stupidest plot twist you've ever seen) and ends up going crazy. Kidman wears her hair in a short, black bob and the scenes of her in the mental institution only work because you are simply amazed at how much she looks like Elizabeth Montgomery playing Serena on "Bewitched." That's one of only two good things I can say about this "remake;" you get to see how amazingly like Montgomery Kidman looks. It almost makes you want to see the feature film version of "Bewitched" that Kidman is working on after this film. (More about the other reason later).

But Kidman's acting is just awful. (Of course, she's not alone). When is the last time she was even in a good movie? Even "Moulin Rouge" proved her to be more a pretty face than a serious actress. Like Matthew Broderick, Bette Midler, Christopher Walken and a slew of lesser known names who also appear here, Kidman seems to know she is stuck in a steaming pile of crap and, like her peers, she simply gives up on trying to do anything good here. She's as wooden as one of the Stepford wives she is supposed to be suspicious of.

Broderick is equally bad. Appearing to be just this side of a complete nervous breakdown and Ben and Jerry's pig-out session, cutie Broderick is now chubby Broderick. Having been on a steady diet of praise from his run in Broadway's "The Producers," Broderick seems to have overdosed on chocolate as much as he has on praise. Perhaps he is plumping up to take over Nathan Lane's role in the mega-blockbuster production in the future.

The only person here that seems to take any of this seriously (except for director Frank Oz, who seriously thinks he is making a comedy) is Glenn Close. Even the grand dame of acting cannot make a sow's ear out of this shit, let alone a silk purse. Stuck in an ending that is as flimsy, weak and pointless as a paper tent on a camping trip in a rain-forest, Close falls apart in the last real and seems as stuck as the rest of the actors here. Eventually, too, she simply gives up.

The one genius idea in this remake is introducing a gay couple and having the more conservative one of the two wish to change his flamboyant lover into a "Stepford Wife." This seems an idea fraught with possibilities and Paul Rudnick seems to be the perfect screenwriter to adapt the film to such an idea. But, alas, the film has absolutely nowhere to go and this brilliant idea becomes a moot point. Worse, really, the jokes here end up being typical, lame, stereotypical gay jokes about being flamboyant, fashion conscious and limp-wristed. Even a good ole faghag like Midler cannot salvage this interesting idea. The script does take a couple of good jabs at Log Cabin republicans, but it is so stereotypical in its idea of what a "free" gay man would be like that this wonderful inclusive idea becomes yet another cinematic slap in the face.

"The Stepford Wives" ends with one of the lamest cameos on film in ages as Kidman, Midler and the stereotypical homo appear on, yawn, "Larry King Live." It's almost appropriate that one of the oldest and most bland men on the face of the planet ends up at the end of a film filled with some of the oldest jokes and lamest ideas ever captured on celluloid. When this conclusive, weak and insipid moment finally comes we think to ourselves the same thought about this film that we are having about Nicole Kidman's career: At least it's almost over.

Notes:

Also with Faith Hill and Mike White.

Based on the novel by Ira Levin.

The film was re-shot and re-edited several times after negative test screenings.

At one time John and Joan Cusack were going to star together in the film and Tim Burton was going to direct.

The 1975 version was scripted by William Goldman and directed by Bryan Forbes. Stars included Katharine Ross, Paula Prentiss and Tina Louise. In the original version, where the book is treated seriously and based solely in the traditions of Science Fiction, the men succeed in turning all of the women of the town into robots.

Viewed in Austin in June 2004.

Report Card

Script: F

Acting: F

Cinematography\Lighting:
D+

Special Effects\Make Up: C

Music:
D-

Final Grade: F

And Help Support Filethirteen!

Get Your"The Stepford Wives" Stuff...

Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.