Picasso
Trigger (1989)
Somewhere I've heard of a band called "Picasso Trigger,"
I think they must have been gigging around Houston in
the early 90's. I just assumed they had taken their
name from this movie. I thought it might be some really
great, campy, old, B movie. Wrong.
"Picasso Trigger" was made in the late 80's and it
looks like the sort of made-for-cable T&A soft-core
trash that began surfacing in the mid 80's. It wants
to be slick, sexy and action-packed. It succeeds only
in appearing to want to be slick. It's slick in the
way an oil spill is slick - greasy, slimy and foul smelling.
As for sexy and action- packed, it fails. The endless
scenes of modelesque women in lacy lingerie and flesh-hugging
swimwear/surfwear is like looking at a "Playboy" centerfold
wannabee. This is exactly what director/writer Andy
Sidaris wants, or so it seems. But who really thinks
the "Playboy" models are sexy? They're more picturesque.
Maybe one could say they are slightly sexy, but unlike
his predecessors Russ Meyer and Ted V. Mikels, Sidaris'
film isn't erotic; it's frilly. As for action, Sidaris
packs numerous explosions and gunfights into the film,
but none of them make any sense. These are about the
quality of Made-for-cable special effects, nothing more.
Worse yet is Sidaris gimmicky special effects ala James
Bond. We get remote control cars carrying explosives
and, get this! - a crutch that fires a mini-missile.
It looks quite silly. Without any kind of a plot to
justify them, the action and effects become as mind-numbingly
vapid as the centerfold females.
Of course, Sidaris isn't really worried about plot
here. It's a good thing too because what he has is so
nonsensical one cannot follow it. In order to work as
many models into the film as possible, Sidaris constructs
a plot involving an elite group of agents (mainly pseudo
"Victoria's Secret" models) who work for some unnamed
agency. Some slimy guy, who calls himself "Picasso Trigger"
after a painting he likes, dies in the beginning and
then attempts are made on a few other characters' lives.
We never can really follow why. Eventually, Guich Koock
(who used to be on a TV show called "Carter Country"
in the 70's) calls Steve Bond (who happens to be in
a g-string swimsuit at the time - y'know, something
for the ladies) and Bond assembles the forces to wipe
out some pit-faced drug-lord looking guy. Eventually,
everyone gets double-crossed but it's pretty confusing.
Don't bother trying to figure it out.
As for the actors, well... they suck. This isn't the
lamest cast of unknowns you will probably ever see on
a T&A movie, but it's pretty close. No one can get their
lines right because no one can figure out what the hell
they are supposed to be doing or saying. It's as nonsensical
to them as it is to us. Of course, none of them were
hired for their acting abilities, anyway. I wonder how
many of them really are centerfold models? "Playboy"
is thanked in the end credits. Maybe someone more familiar
with the subject matter would recognize their names?
Dona Spier (who plays a character named Donna), Hope
Marie Carlton, Roberta Vasquez, Cynthia Brimhall? Anybody
ring a bell. The males, meanwhile, are treated like
pieces of meat just like the females. Bond wears swimwear
and tight jeans and co-star Harold Diamond takes every
chance he can get to bear his broad chest. Russ Meyer
must be rolling in his grave.
What's amusing about the film now, only 6 years after
it was made, is that it looks like such a period piece.
The influence of nighttime soaps like "Dallas" and "Dynasty"
are unmistakable here. The characters drive big, expensive
sports cars and live in the most luxurious abodes. The
fashions and the settings all reflect this phony opulence
we saw on TV in the late 80's. Albeit, it does reflects
the kind of world a model might live in, so it does
seem slightly realistic. But when all is said and done,
it is a reflection of TV - and not of reality, and therefore
the entire film looks even more dated.
There are also expensive looking special effects with
numerous explosions used to try and heighten the film's
action feel. There is a speed boat chase and a sequence
in a small airplane. Also, numerous shots are obviously
done from a helicopter. Boats and cars are also blown-up
in the film. There even a sequence filmed in a Sea World
type aquarium. Sidaris must have money and know people
who have money. Arlene Sidaris (his wife, daughter?)
produces this film so some of the money used to make
the film must be theirs. Sidaris shot the film in Shreveport,
Louisiana, Vegas and Hawaii - plus there are a few shots
of Paris, so one must assume he also had the cash to
travel and film. I wonder what the budget for this baby
was and how much money his upper- class friends put
into it. The opening logo proclaims this to be a production
of Malibu Bay Films and one must also assume that this
is Sidaris' own company. One of his earlier films also
had "Malibu" in the title (see notes).
"Picasso Trigger" is boring, dated, anti-erotic and
muddled. The special effects and the opulent settings
are as vacuumous as one would expect. With the numerous
amounts of sexual erotic and pornography available to
consumers now, what little sex there is in the film
is a moot point. It's only surprising that the characters
don't do large amounts of cocaine on screen. In all
likelihood, they were all doing it off screen. (Note
that drugs are never referred to in the plot). This
film literally sucks the 80's right into it's void.
It's kind of fitting that it was made so close to the
decade's end.
Note: Also with Bruce Penhall, Roderigo Obregon and
John Aprea (as the titular Picasso Trigger).
Director of Photography is Howard Wexler. Is this
a relative of Haskell Wexler, the great 60's cinematographer,
or just wishful thinking in the guise of homage?
The atrocious music is by Gary Stockdale. He also
sings one of the songs, as does Shelby Daniels. Some
of the pop like songs were co-written by Kevin Klinger.
The Nepotism Factor 1: As stated earlier, one Producer
is Arlene Sidaris. Also Second Assistant Director is
Christian Drew Sidaris.
The Nepotism Factor 2: Laurie Penhall has a small role
in the film.
The Nepotism Factor 3: The painting "Picasso Trigger"
used in the film is by Jimmy Hadder. Dave Hadder does
still photography and is credited as a grip. Jimmy Hadder
is credited as an assistant to the Production Designer.
Costumes by Fionna. The abysmal choreography is by
Gary Mascaro. The martial arts scenes were choreographed
by Diamond. The Crutch Gun was designed by Ellen Jones
Pryor. The model plane and car used in the film was
designed and operated by Richard Keppel.
The Picasso Triggerfish is apparently a real thing.
A fish like the one in the painting is shown in the
film's closing credits at an aquarium and, in frame
to the left, one can see the placard the designates
it as such. A friend of mine studying to be a Marine
Biologist has not heard of them but tells me there are
such things as triggerfish - and the Encyclopedia backs
him up.
Sidaris has been making films for quite some time.
I have found references to 3 of his films with only
a cursory investigation. Two films are said to be prequels
to this one, "Hard Ticket to Hawaii" (date unknown)
and "Malibu Express" (1985). The latter is said to be
a loose remake of Sidaris 1973 film, "Stacey" (aka "Stacey
and Her Gangbusters").
Review written in 1996
|
Report
Card
Script:
F
Acting: F
Cinematography\Lighting: D
Special Effects\Make Up: C-
Music: F
Final
Grade: F
|
Get
Your Stuff:

|
More
of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click
your favorite letter to go there.
a
b c
d e
f g
h i
j k
l m
n o
p q
r s
t u
v w
x y
z
HOME
|