Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

The Good Girl (2002)

I have seen lots of movies; "Requiem for a Dream," for example, which other people find depressing. I always found movies like that to be challenging, insightful, unique and artistically inclined. "The Good Girl" is the first movie in a long time that simply just depressed the fuck out of me. And with little to recommend it otherwise. It's tagline should read: If you want to feel blue - We've got a film for you.

The acting here is almost laughable. Watching Jennifer Aniston of TV's "Friends" (a show I like - so there) and hottie young actor Jake Gyllenhaal attempt Texan accents is almost get-wrenching. They fail miserably.

And the script. God, it's awful and mean-spirited and full of bile. Mike White, the caustic, infant(ile) terrible, wunderkid behind "Chuck and Buck," is the person to blame here. He creates a world that speeds right past American suburban ennui into the void of ridiculous nothingness. His story has no meaning, his characters have no redeeming qualities. This film holds up suburban, white Southerners to the light and finds them nothing but ridiculous buffoons. The contempt here is splayed across the scene like the belly of a slaughtered animal being opened up. It's revolting. There is not one human thing in "The Good Girl." Not one.

Aniston and Gyllenhaal and John C. Reily and Tim Blake Nelson and White and provide some of the worst stereotypical characters one can imagine here. It can be expected from White. It can be forgiven, perhaps, from Aniston and Gyllenhaal. But we expect more from Reily and Nelson. They should know better. Shame on them. Anyway, the acting here is mainly of the looking of into the distance and attempting to appear "wan" variety. No one truly acts, for heaven sakes. They simply glob onto the screen like so much cheap cosmetics. These aren't characters. They are desperate actors sighing.

Director Miguel Arteta is way out of line. His film is paced wrong, lighted wrong, and shows nothing of the lives of the characters that isn't caricature or TV-sitcom-esque. This film is played out as a comedy (we are invited to laugh at the sincerity of the characters). It's vulgar and, again, mean-spirited. I have not seen such disrespect and outright hatred of characters since Neil LaBute's dismal "Nurse Betty."

And Arteta's choice in music is lame as well. His score, by four different composers no less, is nothing short of "American Beauty" wannabee filler material. And the final use of music over the end credits is as sloppy and picayune as imaginable.

But, really, it is mostly White who is to blame. Arteta would be wise to move along and try to find someone worthy of having his work filmed. White really scares me. He is an unstable individual. He should seek professional help immediately. His vile contempt for humanity surpasses misanthropy and borders on criminal insanity.

"The Good Girl" is one of the most disturbing pieces of cinema to come out in 2002. But not in a good way. Not at all.

Note:

Also with Zooey Deschanel, Deborah Rush, John Carroll Lynch, and John Doe (of X fame in a non-speaking role).

Report Card

Script: F

Acting: F

Cinematography\Lighting: F

Special Effects\Make Up: F

Music: F

Final Grade: F

And Help Support Filethirteen!

Get Your "The Good Girl" Stuff...

Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.