Die
Bitteren Tranen der Petra Von Kant (1972) (aka
The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant )
Rainer Werner Fassbinder's claustrophobic look at
a lesbian relationship is stilted, harsh, staged and
cold. It's emotionless facade only broken to show bitterness,
jealousy, rage or hatred. It's unflattering look at
females says more about Fassbinder himself than it does
about relationships of any kind, lesbian or otherwise.
Fassbinder shows his hand from the first frame. A
static shot of lazy cats on a staircase (a feminine
symbol?) stays for several moments as the entire credits
(there are no end credits) role before our eyes. Fassbinder
calls the film "ein krankheitsfall" (a case history)
as if this story had any basis in reality. It seems
more like one of Fassbinder's own real relationships
twisted into a lesbian storyline than something that
actually happened as it is shown. Many, in fact, say
this is so and reading about Fassbinder, one would have
to believe it!
After the credits finally cease, Fassbinder's camera,
aided by Director of Photography Michael Ballhaus, pulls
back to reveal a huge wall covering that looks like
the work of Michelangelo (it may very well be). The
soft round images of the naked man and woman in the
reproduced painting offer a sharp juxtaposition to the
thin, creased, linear characters we get in the film.
This is the only softness in the film and it is relegated
to a two-dimensional rendering in the background. It's
importance is overblown making it seem unreal and impossible.
Watching the characters move in front of it is just
the first in many of Fassbinder's counterbalances.
The entire film takes place in the bedroom/office
of fashion designer Petra Von Kant (Margit Cartensen).
Because of her business, the room is filled with naked
mannequins. Fassbinder uses these objects purposefully.
Notice how they appear in almost every shot, balancing
the human characters in the film. Fassbinder shows us
these cold, emotion-less, motion-less dummies and then
overlaps them with his cold, emotion-less characters
that only move a little bit more than their phony counterparts.
Fassbinder's actresses (there are only female characters
in the film) seem to be instructed to move like robots
themselves. Their moves are so coldly orchestrated and
choreographed that one thinks they are watching some
sort of avant-garde ballet and not a film with a plot.
The attention to detail here is intense. Each movement,
down to the slightest tilt of the head, seems to be
pre-ordained by Fassbinder to allow the character's
stoic facades to appear as window displays. It is always
hard to tell the mannequins from the actual performers
here. When Cartensen first appears, Fassbinder makes
his intentions obvious. She has a cold, plastic look
to her face, as if she has just been cast in some plasticine
factory. She soon after puts on a wig, covering what
little hair she has like a window dresser would a bald
mannequin. It speaks volumes about Von Kant and about
Fassbinder's intentions here. It is no surprise that
this piece began as a stage play. The set here becomes
a show place of non-emotions. A window display of bitterness.
The story we get is a sloppy, stylized soap opera
that is hardly worth watching. The plot is as sickening
as the way Fassbinder treats his characters. The dialogue
the characters mouth is as futile and as masked as the
character's true selves. Yet we must delve only slightly
to understand what is really being said because the
character's intentions here are pretty clear. We see
Von Kant try to seduce the seemingly naive Karin (Hanna
Schygulla) and we know that Karin sees this too. Ultimately,
there is a lot of talk about the dynamics of relationships
and how brutal and emotionless they can be. There is
also some sort of sado-masochistic, domination sub-text
that seems as jaded as it sounds. Eventually, it seems
as if it would be no surprise if all of the characters
suddenly appeared in glossy, black, studded, leather
costumes. In fact, it's kind of surprising when Fassbinder
doesn't do this.
Von Kant is a horrible and disgusting centerpiece
to the film. Like a bowl of rotting fruit, we see her
deteriorate before our very eyes. We are only slightly
surprised when her crusty exterior is broken by her
overwhelming desire for the younger Karin. When this
fascination turns to sickening obsession and the seemingly
naive Karin turns the tables on Von Kant, it is like
exposing the slimy slugs that live under a large, hard,
gray rock. When Von Kant finally admits that it isn't
love she has for Karin but a desire to posses her, we
see her clearly and we know she is right.
Other characters slither between the twosome adding
to the disgust. Irm Herrmann is particularly eerie as
Marlene, Von Kant's oft mistreated maid-servant. Herrmann
speaks no lines here and looks much like one of Von
Kant's mannequins brought to life only to serve her.
Fassbinder, wisely, only hints at what ties these women
together. One keeps expecting some sort of revelation
about their relationship and yet the one that we do
get at the film's end is nothing like the one we expect.
It ends the film on a strange and disturbing note.
Meanwhile, Katrin Shaake (Sidonie) and Gisela Fackelday
(Momma) have a few moments that add to Von Kant's harshness.
As does Eva Mattes as Gaby, Von Kant's distanced daughter.
The true interesting part of this, however, is the behind
the scenes knowledge that Mattes, some 12 years later,
portrayed a Fassbinder-like character in the film "A
Man Like Eva" after the director's death. Compared to
her later appearance, she seems so young here.
Fassbinder constructs a sterile world for his film.
The claustrophobic sets personify the emotionless nature
of the characters and the script. The lack of music,
except when Von Kant puts one of her favorite tunes
on a record player, makes the film seem even more stagnant.
This absence of sound is all to stifling and adds to
the constrictions that hem in the film. Finally, Fassbinder's
linear feel to the film, which somehow reminds one of
the way Alfred Hitchcock filmed "Rope," adds the final
touch to this other worldliness we get here. It's as
if Fassbinder wanted to construct a alternate universe,
one much too similar to his own, where the absence of
anything but hatred, bitterness and domination permeates
all existence. The void created here is a cinematic
marvel, but it's hell to witness. The lack of movement,
absence of sound, and plodding pace are very hard to
endure. Only a dedicated viewer can handle a film this
intense. For those who do have the determination, the
payoff may be rewarding. but I would guess that most,
like myself, will find little to like here, except,
perhaps, for Fassbinder's style.
Note: In German with Subtitles.
The play was subtitled "Real Feelings." It is said
to be based upon Fassbinder's relationship with Gunther
Kaufmann, a lower class Bavarian who was his first real
love.
Fassbinder appears in a newspaper photo in the film
ala Hitchcock.
The film is "dedicated to someone who became another
Marlene."
Salem El Hedi, who was one of Fassbinder's male lovers,
is a production assistant here. As always, Fassbinder
uses many in his inner circle in the film. Most of those
in the film appeared in many Fassbinder films. It was
his wont to have a company of actors around him at all
times as the man made 41 films in less than 18 years.
Much of this is documented in Robert Katz's biography
of Fassbinder, "Love is Colder than Death."
Review written in 1995
More
of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click
your favorite letter to go there.
a
b c
d e
f g
h i
j k
l m
n o
p q
r s
t u
v w
x y
z
HOME
|
In
Association with:

|
Posters From!
|
|
Please Visit 
|
|