Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

Chicago (2002)

If you love the song "All That Jazz," I mean, really, really love it, then "Chicago" might be a really enjoyable film for you. Because, essentially, it's the only good song in the entire film. The rest of the songs here are pretty much either complete imitations of that song or the typical modern musical dreck that passes for entertainment in mainstream Broadway shows.

And then there's this: I hate those music videos with dialogue. You know the ones, where someone somewhere thought they were making some sort of short film or something and they put dialogue that rambles all over the singing in the music so that it disrupts the flow of the music and irritates the fuck out of you. "Chicago" does that a lot, especially during the first 30 minutes or so. Oh, they try to dress it up as clever intercut, interwoven plot exposition but basically what it is is dialogue and story that steps all over the songs. It just gets to be a constant grate on the nerves. Either sing or have dialogue. Don't do both.

"Chicago" starts pleasantly enough. The popular tune "All That Jazz" is whipped out and a Fosse-esque scene (no backgrounds, spotlighting, minimalistic props) splays across the screen so that we may understand the context of the story and how the film is going to present it. (After all, Fosse was responsible for the original musical stage presentation). But then it just turns out to be one Fosse number after another and none of the songs are interesting or memorable. Director Rob Marshall must have spent a shitload of money in storyboarding, because the film intercuts perfectly between scenes of supposed reality and then the musical, minimalist, Fosse-esque music numbers. It's supposed to be cool. Mainly, it is distracting. This should either be a film or a musical. Instead, it tries to be both and falls flat.

The acting here is decent but it's really hard to accept Richard Gere as a musical singing star. In fact, when he makes his first appearance on the screen, lip-singing to a song, he looks silly. In the preview audience where I saw the film, people tittered and giggled at the spectacle of it. But eventually we get over the initial unintentional humor of his performance and see that he does an adequate job. Catherine Zeta-Jones and Rene Zellweger do fine jobs as well. There's nothing wrong with the acting and the dancing is okay too. It's just nothing exceptional. There's not a single new idea in the film.

There's really not an interesting musical number after the intro, which is only interesting because it's first, until the end of the film. Decked out in all white and in front of a beautiful bank of clear, globe light bulbs, Zeta-Jones and Zellweger put on a song and dance finale that is truly cool to look at. Zellweger really dances her heart out. Nope, there's no complaints on the ladies' performances here.

The biggest problem after presentation and the sheer boredom of the songs is the hideous mean-spirit of the story. This film is a slap in the face to the American system of democracy and a pointed jab at the American obsession with scandal and overnight celebrity. Perhaps this was valid criticism in the days of the 20's and even in the days of OJ, but who wants to see that nowadays? If the viewer stops for a second to consider the story here, he or she will realize that they are being slapped in the face and called a fool. A fool for believing in our system of justice and a fool for being scandal obsessed. The plot of this film is intensely cynical and mean-spirited. Personally, I don't want to see that (for one thing it's been done to death).

People are going to say that "Chicago" is awesome, they have been seduced by the schmaltzy glamour and the glitzy look of the film. People are going to tell you it's a great film musical. They are wrong. This is for fans of the original musical and the actors in it only.

Note:

With Queen Latifah, John C. Reily, Christine Baranski, Lucy Liu, Mya and Taye Diggs. (Diggs was in the cast of "Rent" at one time).

This story, first a play by Chicago Tribune reporter Maurine Dallas Watkins, was made into a film before in 1927 ("Chicago") and 1942 ("Roxie Hart"). Fosse turned it into a musical in the 70's.

The film had several casting rumors as it developed. Cameron Diaz, Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Gwyneth Paltrow, Barbra Streisand, Bette Midler, Goldie Hawn, Liza Manelli, Toni Collette, Bebe Neuwirth and Charlize Theron were all mentioned at one time or another for the lead females. John Travolta, Kevin Spacey and Hugh Jackman were considered for Billy. And everyone from Pam Grier to Kathy Bates to Rosie O'Donnell was considered for the part of Big Momma. (It went to Queen Latifah). The role that went to Lucy Liu was at one time mentioned as being filled by Britney Spears.

This was to be the next film Fosse directed before his death in 1987 made that an impossibility.

Nominated for 8 Golden Globes, more than any other film.

Viewed at a press screening in Austin in December 2002.

Report Card

Script: F

Acting:
A-

Cinematography\Lighting:
B+

Special Effects\Make Up:
A+

Music:
F

Final Grade: D-

And Help Support Filethirteen!

Get Your" Chicago" Stuff...

Search:
Keywords:
In Association with Amazon.com

More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.