Amateur
(1994)
Hal Hartley's
film finds him relaxing his style a little too much.
The worst part: Gone completely is the spewing dialogue.
The characters here speak pretty normally, only a little
cinematic, only expectorating words a little as they
do in the director's previous films. That's mainly because
it would be difficult to mouth Hartley's dialogue any
other way.
This watered-down
approach hurts the film as we've come to expect these
dialogue devices from Hartley. They are sorely missed
here. The dialogue is still crisp, fresh and decidedly
Hartley-esque, but it doesn't have the urgency and the
immediacy of his earlier work.
Hartley
also works in some of his trademark dialogue repetition
but it is soon discarded, as if the writer/director
is trying to break free here. There is a line used twice,
"This isn't a hotel," which could be repeated throughout
the script for effect. Hartley does it near the beginning
only. There is also a hilarious joke about computer
disks that is repeated twice for amusement. It's laugh
out loud funny. Hartley has some of his best cerebral
zingers in the script. "Amateur" is one of the most
accessible and funny movies he's ever made.
The auteur
also uses music well in the film, like he has in the
past. But he weaves more "pop" tunes into the soundtrack
here and it doesn't really help the film. He also uses
some familiar interesting camera work. But he moves
the camera more here than he has in the past. Often
the characters seem to be doing a choreographed dance
for the camera. It's intoxicating and seems to be the
only development in Hartley's repertoire that really
is better here than what we've seen before from him.
Still, before, his static frames often came across as
beautiful paintings, wondrous still-lifes. That doesn't
really happen much here. There is a taste of it in the
opening.
Hartley
stalwart Martin Donovan plays a man with amnesia. He
hooks up with ex-nun turned erotic writer wannabee Elina
Lowensohn. Their chemistry is pretty wicked. The way
they talk and look at each other keeps us guessing as
to what will happen next. Still, it's almost nothing
compared to the chemistry he shares with Adrianne Shelly,
who is sorely missed here.
Then Hartley
also injects a wild plot about industrial intrigue,
if you will, involving Isabelle Huppert and Damian Young.
Of course, these two are also folded into Donovan's
sordid past by Hartley's expert wizardry. Unfortunately,
it's a plot we could really care less about.
What is
the film about? Why is it called "Amateur." I'm not
sure. His characters are a virgin who thinks she's a
nymphomaniac, a amnesiac who can't remember a single
thing about his past, and a woman who was recruited
into the porno industry at age 12. Are they the amateurs?
Is this a supposed synonym for virgins? What is Hartley
trying to say here? I don't know. Still, as always with
the director's work, it is interesting to watch.
The films
ending attempts to repeat Hartley's gripping final line
of dialogue in "Simple Men." I don't mean the same line
of dialogue is used, I just mean the same device is
used. The last line of the piece is very important,
an exclamation point. Hartley is trying to say something
about redemption. I think he wants us to consider if
an evil man can ever be reborn. Just as his nun here
is reborn as a erotic fiction writer, his porn star
is reborn as a woman in control and his accountant is
reborn as a vigilante. Maybe he is trying to tell us
that it takes remarkable events to make men change while
women do it by pure force of will. The men here are
changed by amnesia and by amateur electro-shock therapy.
The women here are reborn by their own willingness and
desire to change their lives for themselves, by belief.
"Amateur,"
in my opinion, is Hartley's weakest work. It's still
great, of course. Maybe it will be a starting point
for some fans, who will then investigate his earlier,
more abrupt and unique work. That would surely be a
good thing.
Note: Also
with Parker Posey who co-starred with Lowensohn in "Basquiat."
Hartley
is credited as a co-producer, writer and director here.
Music by
Jeffrey Taylor and Ned Rifle (Hartley).
(Review
written in 1998)
|
Report
Card
Script:
B
Acting: A
Cinematography\Lighting: C
Special Effects\Make Up: C
Music: A-
Final
Grade: A-
|
Get
Your "Amateur " Stuff:
VHS
|
More
of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click
your favorite letter to go there.
a
b c
d e
f g
h i
j k
l m
n o
p q
r s
t u
v w
x y
z
HOME
|
In
Association with:

|
Posters From!
|
|
Please Visit

|
|