Calendar of Events Whipping Post Reviews Events Coverage Film Maker Interviews Links Notes from Austin Lodgers Favorite Film Makers FILETHIRTEEN.COM
 

Agliff 2002 Festival Shorts

(Note: These reviews were culled from the Filethirteen Daily Coverage of Agliff 2002).

Friends to Lovers Program

The shorts program, was called "Friends to Lovers" and it was surprisingly good. In the past, I have seen shorts programs at festivals and usually like less than half of them. All 6 of the shorts here were excellent. A short rundown (so to speak):

The Boyfriend: Well directed, well acted and charming. It accepted infidelity within a gay relationship as normal but the film nonetheless wins us over with its warmth and gentle humor. Good acting and great chemistry from the principles.

Lunch with Eddie: Even though this story had a framework around an AIDS issue, it was funny and sweet-natured. The lead actors were all good but the main one, who played a sort of ageing Jewish queen, was really wonderful. He reminded me of that gay actor from the 70's who starred in "Boys in the Band" but this film was not of that ilk, of course. This script may have been a little typical but it was well- filmed and, again, the acting and characters were top-notch. The dialogue was wonderful and warmly humorous.

Last Supper: A hilarious German film full of all the drama and angst we would expect from a film from that country. But this one has twists that make it unique and pointed. A real comic gem.

INSIDE/out: This film is really wonderful. Nearly silent, the opening seems to border on overwrought drama when a young man, barely out, gets date raped. But the film ends on a positive note and has a real sense of reality to it. A story that is perhaps not as "scripted" as we would like to believe. Perhaps based more on reality that we would care to believe. A wonderful and sensitive portrayal by the lead, who is also adorable by the way. Probably the best dramatic gay short I've seen in a long time.

Friends First: Almost a one man show. You'd believe this was a video film shot by the main actor because it is personal and poignant, but I believe it was directed by someone else. A guy struggles with his feelings over sex and friendship after he finds himself falling in love with one of his closest friends. Told primarily from the lead's perspective, the acting is quite good here and the script is excellent. The production may be a little videoesque, but this never detracts from the story. In fact, it makes it seem much more personal.

Baby Blue: Although this one ends on a silly note with some sexual moaning going way over the top as the credits role, the film, which features a lot of images of a sexy young man in various stages on undress, and in the shower, is quite personal and poignant. Shot on film, presumably 8mm, and then overdubbed with a narrative soliloquy, the film is a wonderful example of a filmmaker using the tools at his disposal to make a film that is sexy, poignant and insightful. A really nice and personal film exploring youthful gay curiosity and sexuality.

Gay Propoganda

Many of them were just reworkings of classic and popular films simply using a gay cast of actors. None of these were particularly effective or funny. I don't know what I expected, but I thought it might be a little more than this, or a little more interesting. Perhaps what works best about these shorts is that they prove just how interchangeable (unimportant?) gender and sexual identity has become in the new millennium. These reworkings with gay characters, or gender switches, seemed like mere weak imitations of greater film.

Of the 10 films in the program, only one wasn't available for viewing, a lesbian reworking of "Moonstruck."

"Casablanca," "From Queer to Eternity," "Goodfaigolas," "Polterqueer," and "Reservoir Dykes," were all rather lame. "The Gay Graduate," which was also a lesbian reworking, was one of these too but it worked much better than the other simple facsimiles here. "Taxi Lesbian," a take-off on "Taxi Driver" had a much better idea behind it without just being about the lines of the original film being recited by actors who look like the original actors (but are sometimes a different gender), in sets that look similar to the original sets.

But, for me, a gay man, the best of the bunch was "Hung Frankenstien," a literal reworking of the scene in Mel Brooks' "Young Frankenstein," where the monster takes Madeline Kahn to bed for the first time. The young gay guy who played the Kahn role was hilarious! It worked perfectly.

There were three films in the program as well that had absolutely nothing to do with cinema (and one that did). I can't figure out what most of these films were doing in this series of shorts. They not only didn't fit, two of them were just bad.

The opening film, another short by Randy Eisenberg (presumably of NYC), was funny and vibrant and deserving of 3 snaps up, girl. This was called "Nothing Too Painted" and it did start with a scene that seemed reminiscent of several other film, with a gay guy at a psychiatrist's office. This film wasn't based on an idea that was all that original but it did have a really nice queer sensibility, good acting, good direction, good technical skill involved, and was humorous. Eisenberg's film "Two Big Fags" is also playing at the fest and is funny as hell.

The film that fit somewhat was a spoof of 50's educational films that were purportedly done by a doctor about male, teenage sexuality. Again, there was nothing really original here, but it was funny and sexy as hell. There were several young male bodies suggesting or demonstrating masturbation techniques and it was pretty damn hot, even in black and white.

I won't say too much about "Quacks like a Duck," by Steve Ferger (the only filmmaker in attendance) except that it didn't make any sense. I think it was trying to reaffirm gay stereotypes by suggesting that if a man is effeminate, he is gay. Then again, maybe it was a suggestion that this stereotyping is wrong. Whatever Ferger was trying to say, I didn't get it. And the film failed to be amusing or interesting although the acting and technique of the film were consummate.

And now the cinematic atrocity. This film had no opening titles and made no sense. It eventually turned into a claymation piece about a dog in love with a chicken. It was made by Don Thomas and it was listed in the program as "Pedro and Tony?" the question mark indicating that even Agliff didn't know what to call this piece of dung. It was horrid and so fucking long. It made no sense and was a complete waste of time and celluloid (or video or whatever). Words cannot express the utter awfulness that is this film. It's the first cinematic train wreck I've seen in a while. Someone again needs to remind Agliff that quality should be the first criteria for including a film. Just because it's probably the only gay claymation piece ever made is no reason to show it. It has to be worth my time to see it. This film was horrible. It left a bad taste in my mouth, as if I had been eating Play-Dough rather than watching it be molded into a cinematic mess.

My Gay Movie

(Note: These reviews were actually written when the series was shown for the first time in July of 2002. The series was repeated again during the festival on Labor Day at 12 noon. I went with some friends, as my film "Rector" was included in the program again. This time, "Rector" ran as the second to last film, as they were not shown in the same order. I liked it much better in this context. The Gym Project film was shown second.)

The first film was by Deborah Abbott. Deb is a Xena look alike who I met a couple years back through Miss Xanna Don't. I believe they both appear in the never-released "Rowdy Round-Up: Attack of the Killer Piņatas" by Kevin (oh what the hell is his name). Abbott is a really sweet young lady and she was in no less than three of the evenings films. (She won an award for Festival Whore for all her trouble). Anyway, this first film was a 2 minute, one-joke short that was pretty funny called "Pretty as a Picture." It was a good start to the evening.

But the opening momentum was crashed by "Five Words," a redundant and typical documentary where several local lesbians said four words to describe themselves. The fifth word was always "normal," as if that were something to aspire to.

"The Right Girl" was a horrid and starched project by some African American lesbian out of NYC. It was poorly acted and trite. Much of the same could be said for Jackie L. Hopper's "Sexy Boy" short but at least he had the good sense to play a remix of Air's "Sexy Boy" on the soundtrack and pump it up so loud that it drownded out the dialogue.

"Cigarettes" was the only film I thought people might like less than mine. A German expressionist, nihilistic, lesbian music video that looked like it fell right off of SNL's "Sprockets" skit.

I will list the names of the participants of the GYM Project off the program because they are so fierce and wonderful: Travis Cordingly, Amy Auchey, Caitlin Lowell, Israel Herrera, Joseph Wolbrecht, Libby Coyne, Patrick David, and Stephanie Elkins. This film only pissed me off because it was 15 minutes long (the limit was supposed to be 8 minutes but three films violated this). And, of course, because it was so good and made mine seem to stink up the place.

After "Rector," my film, there was a hilarious animated short made on computer called "Injustice Woman." This had a hilarious superhero female who talked like a black woman and went to kick Osama Bin Laden's ass. It was fierce.

"A Word From Our Sponsors" was a dreary 10 minute fiasco that purported to be about a Gay TV cable station which included two guys sitting down to watch the channel, a supposed movie and several commercials all making the same joke about a dildo. It was horrid.

"Oddly Happy" however wins my prize as the most horrible film thing of the evening. This was another one of those pointless and pedantic interview documentaries where gay men and lesbians are interviewed. Here they discussed three issues: what it means to be gay, religion and kids. Not one of these gay persons had a personality. You could not find ten gay people as bland and uninteresting as the ones featured here if you had a million years to search. To add to the mind-numbing dullness of the film, each one was interviewed while sitting on a couch covered in the most banal leopard skin cloth one could find at Wal-Mart. This film made me want to cut my skull open, take my brain out, and kick it at the screen. This crap went on for nine and a half minutes.

Thankfully this short was followed by one of the most interesting, a little piece called "The Best Several Minutes." About a disco diva enduring the drama of a relationship break-up, the short starred the fierce Tersa Matthews. This "girl" could have fallen straight out of a John Waters vehicle. All of you would-be campy film directors would be wise to find this "actress." She has star written all over herself (in pink magic marker, no less). This "girl" has got what it takes. Director Ignacio Davis made the film as a student project and it is wonderful and campy fun, a bit unfocused, but made all the more wonderful in its ragged charm by the pure ferocity of all involved. I loved this film!

Finally, Abbott had her second film selected close the festival, a little 9 minute opus called "Toaster." About a lesbian relationship started on the volleyball field, the film was cute, professional and likable. All-in-all a good closer to the proceedings. Other Shorts

The horrible short, "The Last Moment." Now that I have officially seen it at the festival, I can tell you it is an overwrought and ridiculous melodrama about an old queen who commits suicide (for no real reason). The story is told as he fucks a hot little Italian number named Gabriel (who turns out to be the angel Gabriel, of course). There is also a really stupid segment where a busload of drag queens and fairies go to the beach and get high and naked with young children. This abomination is one of the biggest pieces of shit I have ever seen. It suggests that all gay men are suicidal, incapable of experiencing true love. It also suggests that drag queens are only happy on the outside. This film is just stupid as fuck. Even my friend J.K. hated it.

The documentary "When Boys Fly" was preceded by two shorts. One was a late addition to the fest not included in the program which was called "LTR." In case you live in a cave, "LTR" stands for "long term relationship." With this film, I finally realized why I hate "mockumentaries;" they want you to laugh at people who are supposedly being caught in the act (by the camera) of being themselves. That is so misanthropic and cruel. It angers me. "LTR" was another one of those film. It focused on two young lovers in their early 20's, who were starting a relationship and expected to be together (as only young lovers could) for the rest of their lives. This film enjoyed poking a finger at young love and laughing at it. How sadly brutal.

"LTR" had some things going for it, however. Most importantly, it had some truly funny moments that were not making fun of the characters, so much anyway. The best example of these was a joke about gay commitment rings. And the leads were young and hot and very easy to watch for 15 minutes. There was also a funny twist in the plot involving the director/cameraman of the piece. But all the good qualities about this film were overshadowed, for me anyway, by it's savage cruelty.

Next was a hilarious and gloriously gay short called "Two Big Fags" that was basically a conversation between two gay, urban, 20-something males on a park bench. The script was awesome with lots of barbs at modern gay life (but not at gay people) and it was well acted and just fierce as fuck. It was hilarious as well. This was a great short. The film was made by Randy Eisenberg, who should be commended.


More of Lodger's reviews indexed alphabetically! Just click your favorite letter to go there.

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

HOME


All contents of www.filethirteen.com are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in any other way used without our written consent. For more details please e-mail us at  lodger@filethirteen.com  Links to the site are appreciated and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.