 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Pages
Designed By: |
 |
All contents of www.filethirteen.com
are the property of the webmaster and the author of filethirteen.com
and cannot be reproduced, copied, distributed, quoted or in
any other way used without our written consent. For more details
please e-mail us at
lodger@filethirteen.com Links to the site are appreciated
and do not require permission. Informing us of your link to
our site may result in gratitude and heartfelt thanks.
|
|
|
Mike
Tarnower
Surely
the most vibrant and disturbing moment I had a Park city wasn't
the jarring industry "suits" who invaded the sleepy village.
It wasn't the lack of sleep or the tension of being cooped
up with 4 friends in a one bedroom condo for several days.
no, the most disturbing and memorable moment from my week
at the film festival was Mike Tarnower's short film at the
No Dance fest called "15
Minute Tape." Tarnower's vision of a brutal/rape murder
sparked discussion and debate between me and my friends for
days afterwards. It's a monumental film.
From
his homebase in Dallas, Mike was kind enough to answer a few
questions that piqued my curiosity about him and his film.
|
| 1. Tell me about life before you had your own
production company. |
|
Well, lessee...I grew up in Dallas during the quasi-semi-counterculture-middle-Amerika-pre-suburban
experience of the 50's and 60's. Dropped out of art school
at UT Austin in '73, with the idea that after I had acquired
some life experience I would commit myself to painting, and
moved to northern California. This was my blue-collar period.
I married. She had a young boy and girl, and we added a daughter.
I worked as an auto mechanic and then as a carpenter before
returning to school in '78. Graduated from San Francisco State
University with a degree in Industrial Design in 1979. Thus
began my white-collar period. I designed custom aircraft interiors
for corporate customers until 1985. I stopped around the time
of the divorce. After a moderate depression, I regrouped and
started designing specialized computer equipment. I married
Susan in 1988. She wanted to become an attorney; we moved
to Boston so she could attend Northeastern. Due to a bizarre
confluence of events, I ended up supporting us with a job
in sales. The only thing that got me through this period was
the money and an agreement with Susan that after she was established,
it would be "my turn". Although never expecting to move back
to Dallas, a sequence of family issues did bring us back in
1995. My period of "art" began in 1997. If you want to see
what kind of stuff I am doing, check this out:
http://www.mikesvideostuff.com/hey/hey-lodger.htm
|
| 2. And then how did Mike's Video Stuff come
to be? |
|
It was in mid to late 1998 that I began exploring how I
could express myself in video and film. After some research,
I began buying stuff Then I spent a few months teaching myself
how to use it. Initially, my thinking was that I'd be doing
animations (and that is still my ultimate objective); however,
I've concluded that to devote myself completely to animations
requires more resources that I currently have available. So,
even as I work on other, camera-based projects, I continue
to muddle through my first cartoon. When it comes to the selection
of subject matter, my overarching objective is to express
my views about human nature. Even more than most people, I
am awash with deeply held opinions. (If you've ever taken
the time to observe ridiculously opinionated people, then
you know what a truly scary thing this is...)
|
| 3. Tell me about coming up with the
idea for "15 Minute Tape." |
|
The punchline to the old joke is death and taxes. The real
life answer is sex and violence. Which leads us to 15 Minute
Tape. Check this out:
http://www.mikesvideostuff.com/15_minute_tape/trailer/straight%20dope.htm
15 Minute Tape was made for a singular purpose - to stimulate
interest in the production and financing of a feature documentary
on the Theatre du Grand Guignol. 15 Minute Tape is based on
the theatrical principles of the Grand Guignol and emulates
the thematic characteristics of a performance in a current
setting with modern media. My expectation is that someone
will see 15
Minute Tape, recognize and appreciate the intrinsic power
and human qualities of violence, and then assist me in producing
and financing the Grand Guignol project. This was chosen as
the first project for two reasons; Because I've never directed
actors before and I felt that this project could be effectively
produced with a limited amount of directorial skill and experience,
and because the surviving members of the Grand Guignol are
already quite old.
|
| 4. You've said that you wanted to "punish the
audience" with the film. Can you explain that to me a bit? |
|
I think I'd like to qualify the definition of punish. Normally
I don't quibble about semantics; however, the word "punish"
has a morally pejorative connotation that falls outside of
my intent. The Webster definition, 2-a: to deal with roughly
or harshly, fairly explains the extent to which I chose the
word "punish".
|
|
5. What kind of pre-production did you do?
|
| 15 Minute Tape was selected as my first production
because of its simplicity. The biggest pre-production element
was making the plaster positive of Jeanettes face so that Mary
McGrew, the make-up artist, could craft the prosthetic facial
injuries. The balance of pre- and actual production was limited
to those items required for the actual shoot, most of which
-- cushions, masking tape, plastic sheets, the smoked ham --
the audience sees during the outtakes. The final production
budget ended up at around $300, with over half of this committed
to make-up and related expenses. The rest paid for meals. I
did all of the editing, animation, audio and related post production
with my current equipment. To date, approx 10 times that amount
has been spent making tapes, paying festival application fees,
and paying for the trip to Park City. The script, as such, does
not exist. I established a very strict timeline -- and sequence
-- for everything that had to occur. The actors were given specific
lines and instructed to improv themselves into position to deliver
those lines. |
| 6. Tell me about meeting Jeanette? |
|
This was just plain lucky (for me). She and David moved in
next door. It didn't take me long to figure out that they
are both talented actors. After that, it was sort of a harmonic
convergence thing...
|
| 7. And how did you talk her into doing the
role? |
|
I discussed the idea with Jeanette first. Basically, I asked
how she felt about being brutally raped and murdered by her
husband David (on film) and whether she thought he'd be comfortable
with that. She felt that only David would be able to answer
that question. After I explained the concept, she began to
get excited about the project. Then the three of us talked
it over. This would be their first time working together as
actors; they have performed together on stage in improv. While
both of them had reservations, they were enthusiastic about
the idea of creating horror and terror that filtered primarily
through the brain rather than through the eyes. They also
liked the notion that an unspeakable horror would be followed
by a light-hearted, behind-the-scenes view of the cast, crew
and production. For more info on the actors, visit the 15
Minute Tape home page:
http://www.mikesvideostuff.com/15_minute_tape/trailer/trailer-b.htm
|
| 8. Her scenes with Robert (McCollum) are quite
realistic. How did you "direct" the actors in this part of the
film? And then in the rape sequence? |
|
As indicated earlier, they had to deliver specific lines
and had to improv their way to get them said. The first thing
we did was to get them into character. I detailed some particular
traits and behaviors each character needed to exhibit. Then
I turned Rob and Jeanette loose with the video camera. Their
first take, while interesting and thorough with regard to
satisfying the goal of capturing this list of dialog and character
actions, lasted almost 20 minutes with little usable footage.
After reviewing the reel, identifying areas to focus on, and
brainstorming ways to condense the time required without making
it look forced, Rob and Jeanette headed out again. They managed
to shrink it down to around 8 minutes. But this time, we had
a couple of minutes of usable stuff. After another discussion
of ways to shrink the 6 minutes into two, we were able to
capture enough footage to satisfy the opening segment. In
the end, I extracted and strung together 9 clips to create
the look of a random assembly of camera clicks by the inexperienced
owners of a new camera. The beating/rape/murder scene is nearly
12 minutes long. At the extreme far left edge of the screen,
as the audience views it, on the loveseat against the wall,
is a large newsprint pad propped up onto the cushions. Listed
on the pad is the step by step progression, along with the
allotted time allowances and key phrases. We had a couple
of rehearsal walk-throughs to validate the sequencing and
timing. There were two complete takes of the full scene. The
first one was used for the final print. Overall, this went
quite smoothly. The actors understood their roles, the sequencing,
and were able to stick with their characters for the duration
while allowing Mary, the make-up artist, to do her job.
|
| 9. For me, the "outtakes" reel at the end of the film is
what makes it all work so well. How did this come to be? |
|
The outtakes were included from the very beginning. Not only
did the actors know about the outtake-blooper segment, it
turns out that this feature of the project was the principal
reason David and Jeanette agreed to participate. As I explained
to them, as you saw, and as I hope others experience, the
outtake-blooper segment provides a stark counterpoint to the
relentless brutality of the dramatic narrative and establishes
a rational/philosophical context for identifying, dealing
with, and discussing perceptions of real vs. staged violence.
|
| 10. You took the film to Park City for No Dance.
Can you explain a bit about how you got the film to them, what
they said when they accepted it. |
|
Well, I selected No Dance based on their track record --
my research indicated that 15 Minute Tape would receive fair
consideration. In general, I try to limit my submissions to
prominent festivals that have a history of showing harsh and
edgy material. When he called, James Boyd, the No Dance director,
said he really liked the film and its ability to hit him at
such a gut level. He indicated that a lot of 'slasher' movies
are submitted to No Dance and that, on a personal level, he's
a long-time fan of horror and gore flicks. Even with that,
he found 15 Minute Tape profoundly disturbing and difficult
to watch because the action was so believably horrifying.
Interestingly, he strongly recommended that the outtake-credits
sequence be cut in favor of a straight credits roll.
|
| 11. And what did you think of the festival?
|
|
I had a great time. (I'm guessing after a bunch of festivals
with a couple or three different films and nothing but debt
to show for the efforts, I'll be able to slip into the 'jaded
skin' mentality.) I was thrilled to meet other folks who are
trying to create some manner of reality with their dreams
-- filmmakers, screenwriters, directors of photography, students,
dot.com folks, and, of course, you and the intrepid crew from
FileThirteen. No Dance, with director James Boyd, is an emerging,
visionary festival and I'm thrilled to have the association.
Of course, one of the main reasons for going to Park City
is the industry exposure. I think if I were going to add to
the legion of Sundance/Park City flicks being produced, mine
would focus on transplanting LA industry folks to this small,
sleepy ski resort. I can't take credit for this quote, which
came from the producer of another No Dance film: "The movie
business people -- well, they are movie business people...imagine
a thousand used car dealers wearing black, talking in cell
phones, each with a unique 'lean and hungry look'."
|
| 12. You had a pretty good turn out for the showing.
I didn't get to hang around for the Q&A. What kinds of questions
did the audience ask about the film? |
| The Q&A went on for a rather long time, probably
10 to 15 minutes. Interestingly, the questions there were very
much like your questions here. There was a lengthy discussion
about my decision to include the outtake-bloopers segment and
we delved deeper into my intent and purpose for making 15
Minute Tape. Here are a few tidbits you'll appreciate. Concerning
the outtake-bloopers segment -- it was other filmmakers who,
by and large, would have preferred to go straight to a credit
roll, whereas the general audience members seemed genuinely
appreciative of the opportunity to observe the behind-the-scenes
views. Several people offered suggestions that they felt would
have made 15 Minute Tape even more disturbing. And finally,
my reaction. It disturbed me to see so many people so affected
by the film. As you noted in your review, many audience members
were overwhelmed emotionally and had to leave the theater. Of
those who stayed for the Q&A, several had tears trickling down
the cheeks of otherwise stoic faces. I was surprised that it
pained me to see the audience respond the way I had expected.
I made 15 Minute Tape fully expecting that many people would
find it almost incomprehensibly objectionable and would reactively
judge it, and me, in the harshest - most negative - terms possible.
The thing is, I can't spend too much time concerning myself
with the perceived sensibilities of 'the public' and those people
who limit their artistic visions to 'safe' subject matter. My
goal is to examine "truth" (as I see it) and present stories
that illuminate my observations - even if it happens to be a
very dark light. The thing is, I know why I made it; I'm comfortable
with the finished product; and I expect to offend some portion
of the audience with every project I create. (Although this
will always be a significantly lower percentage than for an
audience watching 15 Minute Tape.) |
| 13. What's next for the film? And you and the
actors? |
| Nothing else has shaken out yet. I'm sending out tapes and
keeping my fingers crossed. Everyone's back at work with improv
troupes, commercials, and roles in other filmmaker projects
(as well as mine). As I pointed out earlier, I'm loaded with
opinions. So far, they're bubbling out as ideas. We've begun
work on a new short. Jeanette is starring. David and Rob have
small roles. The other principal, Johnny Sneed, is another talented
actor from the Dallas area. It's a dark comedy, although compared
to 15 Minute Tape it's a completely different - and much, much
lighter - shade of dark. The working title is "lo-fidelity".
Tagline: A man loves TV, ends up "loving" his wife through TV,
(while cheating on her in a most peculiar way), and then ends
up bizarrely coupled with these loves of his life. After that,
if all goes well, one of the four ideas that have promoted themselves
to the top of my to-do list will be selected based on the resources
(actors, locations, crew, budget, etc.) that are available when
the time comes. I'm also talking with a production company (I
met these people in Park City) about an internal project they
have that they want to develop. I continue to work on the animation
project and, if anyone needs some video stuff, I am available
for hire. |
|
|
| Back
to the 13 Questions Index |
|