|
By: Jason Lee (with intro by lodger)
Mark David is one of the most amazing and interesting
people I have met since moving to Austin. His film "Sweet
Thing" truly impresses. One sees the touches of a remarkable
artist in his seminal years in the film. It fills you with
a desire to see what the Mark David will do next.
Multi-talented, mixing film, music and promotion
into his daily life, Mark is a frenzied powerhouse. Mere words
cannot impress upon you what it is to be in his presence.
Terms like intense, focused, frenetic and, yes, even crazed
come to mind. Here, Jason Lee gives you a pretty good insight
into the man that is Mark David...
A Little Out of Control: Austin's Mark David, The Cairo International
Film Festival, Cultural Pride and Why It All Comes Back to Karen
Black by Jason Lee
This past December, Austin filmmaker Mark David found himself
in a peculiar situation. He was in Egypt. People were outside
his hotel room, banging on his door. He was expected at a
nearby television studio in a few minutes, to interview perhaps
the most prestigious Muslim cleric in the country. He had
reason to believe that he had, perhaps, gotten in way over
his head. And it was all because of Karen Black.
To begin the story properly: David directed a movie. The
movie, "Sweet Thing," screened at the Austin Heart of Film
festival in October. It is there, at a party at the Governor's
mansion, that he is introduced to actress/multi-hyphenate
Black. After a few minutes of polite conversation, she remarks:
"Are you Indian, by chance?"
"Er . . . no," responds David, "I'm from Texas, actually.
My parents are from Egypt."
"Oh. I made a picture with Omar Sharif."
"Oh?"
"He's Egyptian."
"I know."
"Do you have any . . . problems with women?"
"What do you mean?"
"They cut off womens' clitorises in Egypt, don't they? Isn't
that, like, their 'thing'?"
"What?! No!"
"Omar was all for it. He's veeeeery sexist."
"As far as I know, that sort of thing is ancient history.
I mean, maybe it happens once in a great while in some of
the villages way off in the boonies, but that's not Egypt."
"Well, Omar said . . . never mind."
At this point, she scans the room for someone to rescue
her from this predicament. He has just one thing left to say:
"Listen, come to the screening of my film tomorrow. I promise
your clitoris will remain intact."
He walks off, but the conversation is niggling at him.
According to his birth certificate, his full name is Mark
R. D. David. The "R. D." stands for "Rashed Dawoud". His parents
just gave him initials, and when he was ten years old, told
him he could keep the full name, choose the Western standard
single middle name, or Anglicize either one as he pleased.
In light of the fact that their original family name, Dawoud,
was changed to "David" when his parents moved to Houston in
the late 60's – and Mark not being big on redundancy – he
kept "Rashed", the only middle name that made it to his passport.
In Cairo, his mother's family owned a prestigious international
boarding school, where she herself taught until it was declared
state property by the Nassar administration. She resumed her
teaching career when she came to the States. His father is
a doctor, but as a Coptic Christian, found it difficult to
build a practice. When David's sister was just a week old,
they moved to Greenwich, England. Less than a year later,
they settled in Houston, where Mark was born in 1974.
At home, his parents would often speak to each other in
Arabic, but encouraged their children to grow up All-American.
They did. The David children were both charismatic and intelligent.
Mark played sports, lifted weights and occasionally beat the
living daylights out of bigger kids who would call him "camel
jockey" or "sand nigger". He played drums in a rock band –
punishing his kit, it appeared, for every snide remark ever
made to his back. He became that favorite of American stereotypes,
the Angry Young Man.
The Cairo International Film Festival accepts "Sweet Thing"
shortly after David's conversation with Karen Black. He is
invited to attend the festival, slated for early December.
On his way to the airport, he buys a camcorder. Spontaneous
by nature, he has just decided to shoot a short video documentary
about the Western world's skewed perception of Egypt, and
of Arabic culture in general. He's frustrated with films like
"The Siege," "Three Kings" and "True Lies" portraying Arabs
as bomb-in-the-cornhole, one-way-ticket-to-Allah violent zealots.
He's going to do his bit to set the record straight, by God.
Upon arrival, he starts shooting "culture shock" footage:
A Porsche going 110 mph passes a man with a cabbage-laden
donkey cart, trekking down the highway…
Rich Egyptian teenyboppers declare their love for Ricky
Martin in three different languages…
Tourists heading for the pyramids pick up their camels in
front of a strategically located Kentucky Fried Chicken…
His guide suggests that he might want to get the blessing
of the chairman of the festival before proceeding to his next
step: candid interviews with other Arabic filmmakers, festival
staff, and random people on the street. When they meet, the
chairman is happy to oblige, and even asks if there's anything
that he can do to help. David assures him that it all seems
to be taken care of.
As far as he's concerned, it is. Despite some drastic cultural
differences – or perhaps because of them -- he feels strangely
at home here. The festival has put him up at a luxurious Nile-front
hotel. His Arabic is good enough to maneuver through both
casual conversations and interviews with local press. The
clash of Western opulence and Third World poverty gives the
city an atmosphere unlike anyplace else he's ever seen. He
finds himself wondering what it would've been like, had his
family never moved to America; what it would be like to call
Cairo his home town.
Drinking Turkish coffee at his hotel, he overhears a pair
of Egyptian festival attendees talking about their chagrin
over how Arabs are portrayed in Western cinema. He remarks
to his guide that he should be interviewing them; is, in fact,
about to run upstairs for his camera when she replies:
"That would not be right."
"Why not?" he asks, "I just want their opinions."
"They might give you the wrong opinions."
"What's a 'wrong' opinion?"
"Trust me. It would not be right."
"Well, who has the right opinion, then?"
"The Mufti. He is like a Christian priest. He is also like
a judge. He interprets the Koran and the Hadith and helps
people with questions."
"Hell, I've got questions. Can I talk to him?"
"Anyone can talk to the Mufti. Rich or poor, Muslim or Christian."
"Yeah, but can I talk to him on-camera?"
"I'll see what I can do."
The next day, it's set up. David's guide insists that, until
he sees the Mufti, he should not interview people for the
documentary. He contents himself for the time being, shooting
footage of Mosques and Coptic churches; schools and marketplaces;
boats on the Nile and lots and lots of traffic.
While all of this is happening, things start to get strange.
It begins innocently enough. Through a contact, the Mufti's
people request to see the questions David intends to ask.
He responds that he just wants to wing it. His guide informs
him that one does not "wing it" with the Mufti. He then asks
to push the interview back a few days to do some research
so he can get the best interview possible. His guide says
this is not possible, the Mufti is a very busy man. From her
tone, he gets the idea. This man is like a priest in the same
way a space shuttle is like a paper airplane: they perform
similar functions, but one is considerably more powerful than
the other. This particular man is the foremost authority on
Islam in the largest city in the Middle East. Strictly in
terms of scale, David had been thinking "parish priest" when
he should've been thinking "archbishop".
They spend a few hours deciding what to say and how to say
it. Though some of the questions are still a little raw for
David's taste, his guide assures him that the finished list
cannot possibly offend this man. Satisfied, David hands them
over. They come back to him severely softened. "Could you
dispel the misconception about the prevalence of clitorectomies
in Arabic culture?" is now, "What about the clitoris?" His
guide chalks the majority of the changes up to the language
barrier. David isn't happy about being censored, but figures
a conditional interview is better than none at all. The meeting
is scheduled for the following morning.
He meets his guide early to discuss where it will take place.
He wants to know if the available light will be good enough
to do this with his camera. She informs him that he won't
need his camera, as the interview will be broadcast live on
Egyptian television. The people who arranged the meeting are
concerned that the footage will be taken back to the States
and edited to twist his words.
Now, the reality of the situation suddenly dawns on him.
The Egyptian government has had several plainclothes police
tailing David (and every other foreign national attending
the festival) since he arrived. His guide points them out
to him in restaurants. The safety of the foreigners at the
festival is a high priority to the powers that be; another
international incident so close on the heels of the Egypt
Air crash will bring heavy heat...
...And here he is, about to interview the most important
religious leader in the country.
A director he may be, but he is NOT a journalist. An improper
line of questioning or a cultural faux pas live on national
television might well trigger some hard feelings twixt Egypt
and the US. What he wanted to be a small, intimate piece has
spun out of control. His initial uneasiness at this gives
way to new tides of real fear. He doesn't know where this
is going anymore, and there could be dire consequences no
matter which path he takes. Alone in his hotel, he debates
the sanity of going ahead as scheduled.
Then comes the knock at his door. A familiar voice -- the
contact – asks politely to see the questions again. Mark stalls
-- he doesn't know if it will be worse if he gives over the
list or if he refuses. He tells the voice that he's decided
against doing the interview, thanks, and that he'll keep the
questions if it's all the same to them. The voice responds,
calmly, politely, that they would still like to see the questions.
The tone says that they will not take no for an answer. David,
seeing no other option, slips the list under the door and
listens to two sets of footsteps fade down the hall.
The folks behind the interview are upset by the cancellation.
David tries to quell them, praising their generosity and saying
simply that the project got to be too much. On the street,
he notices uniformed police (read: "Egyptian Army regulars
carrying loaded Soviet AK-47s") tailing him as well as the
plainclothesmen. He spends that night at a relative's house,
who reassures him that, because he is American, nothing could
possibly happen to him. The relative does agree, however,
that he was right not to go on TV. Mark spends the next few
days paranoid and sleepless, fearing he will return one evening
to a hotel room full of black bag men, homicidal religious
fanatics or a bedful of scorpions. Every Hollywood cliché
comes flooding at him, dim threats from Chuck Norris movies
of long ago; and old Chuck is back in Mark's home town of
Houston, a long way away to come to the rescue.
The irony that he fell into some gibbering paranoid waking
dream about the same myths that he initially set out to dispel
was completely lost on him until he was Stateside once again.
Shortly after the Mufti fiasco, Americans – including "Sweet
Thing's" editor, Jay Duplass – finally started trickling in
to the festival. Things began to go the way they were supposed
to.
Well, almost:
Outside the theater that was screening Sweet Thing, stood
fifteen soldiers. Mark and Jay were elsewhere, this being
the third of five screenings for the film. The film festival
is one of the few pportunities for average Cairo citizens
to see completely uncensored Western films. Inside, people
were settling into the film. Some of them had very young children
in tow. If you've seen the movie, you'll understand what kind
of bad idea this was.
A riot was barely contained after actor Jeremy Fox's full
frontal nude scene. The uproar began after that night's moviegoers
started to get the idea that David's film isn't for the squeamish.
Instead of just leaving, people began shouting at the screen.
This apparently evolved into a shoving match. Luckily, no
one was hurt and no damage was done to the theater.
In retrospect, David acknowledges that he may have overreacted
to the strangeness of the situation. He fully intends to return
to Egypt and finish the documentary.
"It's a beautiful country. Downtown Cairo looks a lot like
midtown Manhattan. There's a beach on the Red Sea about 40
miles away where the ocean is bluer than the Caribbean. Most
of the women I saw could've stepped off the cover of Vogue.
Egypt is an amazing place, but . . .
"I guess things just got a little out of control."
|